Comments for The Unapologetic Mathematician
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com
Mathematics for the interested outsiderFri, 21 Jul 2017 05:39:04 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on Rubik’s Magic Cube by hwlvipone
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/rubiks-magic-cube/#comment-54120
Fri, 21 Jul 2017 05:39:04 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/rubiks-magic-cube/#comment-54120Introduced in great detail, very helpful for beginners, thank you! Also recommend to other beginners, a Rubik’s cube communication website https://albacube.com/
]]>Comment on Rubik’s Magic Cube by The Second Carnival Of Mathematics: The Math Geeks are Coming to Town! | Good Math/Bad Math
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/rubiks-magic-cube/#comment-50698
Sun, 09 Jul 2017 23:24:02 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/rubiks-magic-cube/#comment-50698[…] should have known better. They decided that I must be one of them, and starting chattering on about how the rubiks cube is really all about group theory. And once that got started, things went downhill fast. From group theory, they wandered into […]
]]>Comment on The Integral Mean Value Theorem by John Armstrong
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/the-integral-mean-value-theorem/#comment-32295
Wed, 03 May 2017 18:43:37 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/?p=662#comment-32295Here you go, Robert: https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2010/06/14/the-integral-mean-value-theorem-2/
]]>Comment on The Integral Mean Value Theorem by Robert
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/the-integral-mean-value-theorem/#comment-32294
Wed, 03 May 2017 17:46:20 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/?p=662#comment-32294How can I get the version of mean value theorem for general measure space
]]>Comment on What is Knot Homology? by Knot theory | Bahçemizi Yetiştermeliyiz
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/what-is-knot-homology/#comment-32292
Mon, 01 May 2017 16:49:20 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/what-is-knot-homology/#comment-32292[…] This was not the first time physics had popped up here, either: models from statistical mechanics motivated the von Neumann algebras and braid representations which were originally used to define the Jones polynomial. This was in many ways a pivotal development in the theory: to borrow The Unapologetic Mathematician’s words: […]
]]>Comment on Almost Everywhere by Expanding how we think about math can make the field more accessible. – niknaks
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2010/05/13/almost-everywhere/#comment-32013
Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:14:04 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/?p=5927#comment-32013[…] “almost everywhere” actually has a complex technical meaning that can be found on this blog post. Communicating math is very similar to any other kind of […]
]]>Comment on Transforming Differential Operators by Far Westerner
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/transforming-differential-operators/#comment-31919
Sun, 01 Jan 2017 10:30:24 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/?p=3723#comment-31919I have found it very helpful. Thanks for the post.
]]>Comment on The Existence Theorem for Limits by Maths student
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/the-existence-theorem-for-limits/#comment-31742
Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:06:23 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2007/06/20/the-existence-theorem-for-limits/#comment-31742Where the upper commuting square is, of course, a triangle.
]]>Comment on The Dominance Order on Tabloids by Chih-wen Weng
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2011/01/10/the-dominance-order-on-tabloids/#comment-31588
Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:40:27 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/?p=8336#comment-31588The definition of the dominant order on tabloids is too complicate.
I wonder if using any one of its linear order extension is completely enough for later discussion.
]]>Comment on Maxwell’s Equations (Integral Form) by Carrie Elliott
https://unapologetic.wordpress.com/2012/02/02/maxwells-equations-integral-form/#comment-31462
Tue, 08 Nov 2016 03:13:14 +0000http://unapologetic.wordpress.com/?p=10280#comment-31462Because Maxwell was a thug, and saw the relations underlying all of them. Gauss was extremely gifted, Ampere almost had it right, and Faraday did his own thing, but Maxwell connected it all. All the laws have their own names, individually, for the people who did formulate them originally.
]]>