The First Isomorphism Theorem (for Abelian Categories)
We had versions of the first isomorphism theorem for groups, rings, and modules. Now we’ll do it in a more general setting. We’re going to use it in our study of abelian categories, but it works in all three of the above cases.
As we said last time we talked about abelian categories, we really just use that our categories all have a zero object, kernels, and cokernels. We’ll work with that for now, and note that these properties hold in particular for abelian categories.
Now, if 
is a category with a zero object, kernels, and cokernels, then any arrow 
of has a factorization 
, where 
. This holds because 
, and by the universal property of kernels there is a unique 
with .
On the other hand, if we have another factorization 
with 
also a kernel, then we have a unique 
so that the following diagram commutes.
That is, the canonical factorization described above is in some sense the universal such factorization. Furthermore, if has equalizers and every monic in is a kernel, then is epic. In particular, these hypotheses are all satisfied for abelian categories. This is the isomorphism theorem — that every arrow factorizes essentially uniquely as the composition of an epic and a monic 
.
We prove this by considering the following diagram:
We draw 
. Since is itself a kernel, we see that 
. We also draw 
. Now 
, so 
. By the universal property of 
, there is a unique 
so that 
. And then 
, so factors uniquely through — there is a unique with 
. Furthermore, 
, and so since is monic we have 
. This proves that the first diagram given above commutes.
Now we have to show that is epic under the additional hypotheses. Let’s say that we have a parallel pair of arrows 
and 
with 
. then factors uniquely through the equalizer 
— 
for some unique 
. Then 
. Now 
is monic, so (by the new hypotheses) it’s a kernel. By the first part of the theorem we have a unique with 
, and thus 
. Since the monic 
has a right inverse, it’s an isomorphism. Since was picked as the equalizer of and , 
. And so is epic.
September 25, 2007 -
Posted by John Armstrong |
Category theory
The Unapologetic Mathematician 
[…] Coimages, and Exactness By the first isomorphism theorem, we know that any morphism in an abelian category factorizes as with , and is epic. Since is […]
Pingback by Images, Coimages, and Exactness « The Unapologetic Mathematician | September 26, 2007 |
[…] We already said that (also ) is a abelian category. Now in any abelian category we have the first isomorphism theorem. […]
Pingback by The Rank-Nullity Theorem « The Unapologetic Mathematician | June 27, 2008 |
I was wondering if there’s a way to do this in more general categories – for example, I was told about a “First Isomorphism Theorem for Sets” that goes as follows:
In $\mathbf{Set}$, consider a map $f \colon X \to Y$, and consider $Z$ given by $X / \sim$ where $\sim$ is the equivalence relation given by $a \sim b$ if $f(a) = f(b)$.
Then the First Isomorphism Theorem tells us that $\tilde{f} \colon Z \to \mathrm{im}(f)$ is an isomorphism. Is there anyway to put this in a more categorical setting?
I’m sorry, it seems I misunderstood how LaTeX works on WordPress. The above post should have read:
I was wondering if there’s a way to do this in more general categories – for example, I was told about a “First Isomorphism Theorem for Sets” that goes as follows:
In
, consider a map 
, and consider 
given by 
where 
is the equivalence relation given by 
if 
.
is an isomorphism. Is there anyway to put this in a more categorical setting?
Then the First Isomorphism Theorem tells us that
Yes, if you consider carefully what properties of an Abelian category we’re using here. As I note above, this proof just uses the fact that we have a zero object, kernels, and cokernels.
Now,
doesn’t have a zero object, so there are no kernels and cokernels. But there are equalizers and coequalizers, so that gives you something to start gnawing at.
[…] it’s a very concrete representation of the first isomorphism theorem. Every transformation is decomposed into a projection, an isomorphism, and an inclusion. But here […]
Pingback by The Meaning of the SVD « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 18, 2009 |
[…] for the singular value decomposition, what we’ll end up with is essentially captured in the first isomorphism theorem, but we’ll be able to be a lot more explicit about how to find the right bases to simplify […]
Pingback by Decompositions Past and Future « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 24, 2009 |
[…] may not be Abelian, but it has a zero object, kernels, and cokernels, which is enough to get the first isomorphism theorem, just like for rings. Specifically, if is any homomorphism of Lie algebras then we can factor it […]
Pingback by Isomorphism Theorems for Lie Algebras « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 15, 2012 |