Uses of the Jordan-Chevalley Decomposition
Now that we’ve given the proof, we want to mention a few uses of the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition.
First, we let be any finite-dimensional
-algebra — associative, Lie, whatever — and remember that
contains the Lie algebra of derivations
. I say that if
then so are its semisimple part
and its nilpotent part
; it’s enough to show that
is.
Just like we decomposed in the proof of the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition, we can break
down into the eigenspaces of
— or, equivalently, of
. But this time we will index them by the eigenvalue:
consists of those
such that
for sufficiently large
.
Now we have the identity:
which is easily verified. If a sufficiently large power of applied to
and a sufficiently large power of
applied to
are both zero, then for sufficiently large
one or the other factor in each term will be zero, and so the entire sum is zero. Thus we verify that
.
If we take and
then
, and thus
. On the other hand,
And thus satisfies the derivation property
so and
are both in
.
For the other side we note that, just as the adjoint of a nilpotent endomorphism is nilpotent, the adjoint of a semisimple endomorphism is semisimple. Indeed, if is a basis of
such that the matrix of
is diagonal with eigenvalues
, then we let
be the standard basis element of
, which is isomorphic to
using the basis
. It’s a straightforward calculation to verify that
and thus is diagonal with respect to this basis.
So now if is the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of
, then
is semisimple and
is nilpotent. They commute, since
Since is the decomposition of
into a semisimple and a nilpotent part which commute with each other, it is the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of
.
Could you elaborate a bit (or just give me a hint) on the first “identity: … which is easily verified”? I’m not seeing it…
Thanks.
Run an induction on
; it works out sort of like the binomial theorem does.
[…] we know that is the semisimple part of , so the Jordan-Chevalley decomposition lets us write it as a polynomial […]
Pingback by A Trace Criterion for Nilpotence « The Unapologetic Mathematician | August 31, 2012 |