Integration with Respect to a Signed Measure
If is a signed measure then we know that the total variation
is a measure. It then makes sense to discuss whether or not a measurable function
is integrable with respect to
. In this case,
will be integrable with respect to both
and
. Indeed, since
this is obviously true for simple
, and general integrable functions are limits of simple integrable functions.
This being the case, we can define both integrals
and, since , it makes sense to define
This integral shares some properties with “positive” integrals. For instance, it’s clearly linear:
Unfortunately, it doesn’t play well with order. Indeed, if is a measurable
-negative set, then
everywhere, but
This throws off most of our basic properties. However, some can be salvaged. It’s no longer necessary that a.e. for the integral to be zero, but it’s sufficient. And, thus, if
a.e. then their integrals are equal, although the converse doesn’t hold.
One interesting fact is that for every measurable set we find
where we take the supremum over all measurable functions with
everywhere. Indeed, if we take a Hahn decomposition
for
, then since
is measurable so are
and
. If we take
and
, then we find
Thus we can actually attain this value. Can we get any larger? No. We can’t achieve anything by adding to the value of outside
, since the integral is only taken over
anyway. And within
we could only increase the positive component of the integral by increasing the value of
in
, or increase the negative component by decreasing the value of
in
. Either way, we’d make some
, which isn’t allows. Thus the total variation over
is indeed this supremum.