The Unapologetic Mathematician

Mathematics for the interested outsider

Construction of the G2 Root System

We’ve actually already seen the G_2 root system, back when we saw a bunch of two-dimensional root system. But let’s examine how we can construct it in line with our setup.

The G_2 root system is, as we can see by looking at it, closely related to the A_2 root system. And so we start again with the 2-dimensional subspace of \mathbb{R}^3 consisting of vectors with coefficients summing to zero, and we use the same lattice J. But now we let \Phi be the vectors \alpha\in J of squared-length 2 or 6: \langle\alpha,\alpha\rangle=2 or \langle\alpha,\alpha\rangle=6. Explicitly, we have the six vectors from A_2\pm(\epsilon_1-\epsilon_2), \pm(\epsilon_1-\epsilon_3), and \pm(\epsilon_2-\epsilon_3) — and six new vectors — \pm(2\epsilon_2-\epsilon_1-\epsilon_3), \pm(2\epsilon_1-\epsilon_2-\epsilon_3), and \pm(\epsilon_1+\epsilon_2-2\epsilon_3).

We can pick a base \Delta=\{\epsilon_1-\epsilon_2,2\epsilon_2-\epsilon_1-\epsilon_3\}. These vectors are clearly independent. We can easily write each of the above vectors with a positive sign as a positive sum of the two vectors in \Delta. For example, in accordance with an earlier lemma, we can write


where after adding each term we have one of the positive roots. In fact, this path hits all but one of the six positive roots on its way to the unique maximal root.

It’s straightforward to calculate the Cartan integers for \Delta.



which shows that we do indeed get the Dynkin diagram G_2.

And, of course, we must consider the reflections with respect to both vectors in \Delta. Unfortunately, computations like those we’ve used before get complicated. However, we can just go back to the picture that we drew before (and that I linked to at the top of this post). It’s a nice, clean, two-dimensional picture, and it’s clear that these reflections send \Phi back to itself, which establishes that \Phi is really a root system.

We can also figure out the Weyl group geometrically from this picture. Draw line segments connecting the tips of either the long or the short roots, and we find a regular hexagon. Then the reflections with respect to the roots generate the symmetry group of this shape. The twelve roots are the twelve axes of symmetry of the polygon, and we can get rotations by first reflecting across one root and then across another. For example, rotating by a sixth of a turn can be effected by reflecting with the basic short root, followed by reflecting with the basic long root.

Finally, we can see that this root system is isomorphic to its own dual. Indeed, if \alpha is a short root, then the dual root is \alpha itself:


On the other hand, if \alpha is a long root, then we find


and so the squared-length of \alpha^\vee is \frac{2}{3}. These are now the short roots of the dual system. Scaling the dual system up by a factor of 9 and rotating \frac{1}{12} of a turn, we recover the original G_2 root system.

About these ads

March 8, 2010 - Posted by | Geometry, Root Systems

1 Comment »

  1. [...] « Previous | [...]

    Pingback by Construction of the F4 Root System « The Unapologetic Mathematician | March 9, 2010 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 366 other followers

%d bloggers like this: